DgoBuy spreadsheet data: prices, QC and reviewed images
1916 visible records, 44 positive QC counts and 57 reviewed images describe different kinds of evidence.
In this article
A directory becomes misleading when every field is treated as a quality claim. Our product amounts, supplied QC counts and image-review flags come from different checks. This page explains what each one records, how the published counts are calculated and what they leave unanswered.
Two dates do different jobs
The catalogue used for these articles was checked 22 – 23 Oct 2026. Editing the prose does not refresh product availability, prices or reported QC photos. Those remain tied to the catalogue snapshot until its records are updated.
The site uses a stored public product-field snapshot. It is not a live account connection, payment history or warehouse feed for an order you placed. The same snapshot supplies the product directory and the article counts, so readers can open a filtered view and compare its rows.
Positive, zero and missing QC counts are different states
| Supplied field | Visible records | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| A number greater than zero | 44 | A positive count was supplied; the corresponding images still need to be opened and matched |
| An explicit zero | 1872 | The supplied count is zero; this does not establish that no photos exist anywhere |
| No count supplied | 0 | Unknown, kept separate from an explicit zero |
The counts add up to the visible product pool. They are counts of records with a field value, not a count of inspected items. We have not used the positive count to assign a star rating, establish authenticity or certify a seller.
For a single row, the QC-column walkthrough shows the next question: can you view the relevant photographs and establish that they show the selected item? Without that connection, the number alone cannot settle the comparison.
What the reviewed edit checks
57 current records have an editorial image-review flag. The review is attached to the exact product slug, image and, where recorded, title. If those no longer match the approved record, the flag is not carried over automatically. This prevents an edited title or replaced image from inheriting a check of different material.
The review is used to build smaller visual edits for puffers, scarves and winter boots. It checks the reference used in the edit; it does not record a physical sample inspection, a fabric test, a completed order or a review of the reported warehouse-photo set.
This is why a puffer can have a reviewed catalogue image and still show zero supplied QC photos. Those fields answer different questions. The puffer filter comparison shows the two conditions without turning either into a quality score.
A positive QC count and an image-review flag can overlap
| Image-edit status | Positive QC count | Explicit zero | Count missing |
|---|---|---|---|
| In the image-reviewed edit | 1 | 56 | 0 |
| Outside the image-reviewed edit | 43 | 1816 | 0 |
The image-review total follows one flag; the QC columns follow another field. Neither is a stock check or a material test. A zero QC field can coexist with a reviewed catalogue image because the review did not inspect a reported warehouse-photo set.
The puffer photo comparison and scarf package comparison show what a catalogue image observation looks like. It is deliberately narrower than a claim about an item received by a buyer.
How the price examples stay reproducible
Budget examples use the same filtering rules as the directory. The maximum is inclusive, missing USD amounts are excluded from a price-filtered set, and the reviewed switch checks its own flag. For references recorded in cents, a below-$40 example sets a maximum of 39.99. 1916 records also have a CNY reference field. The published CNY/USD pairs are stored references, not a current agent funding rate.
The $20 category table reports each category separately. The results count records, so repeated titles remain separate when they belong to separate product URLs. We do not merge them into a fictional unique product or infer a sales rank from their repetition.
A price difference may be reported without being explained. The black-shorts comparison preserves both URLs and supplied amounts, while leaving the selected option, batch and unquoted fees unresolved. That is a more useful record than choosing a winner from the title alone.
What community and official sources can add
A public buyer post can supply the author’s selected size, observations and reported delivery context. It does not automatically verify an order or establish a match to a product in this directory. Our Reddit source review labels the different contexts and links the original discussions.
An official help article can document a provider’s stated policy at a particular date. It is still different from the live options for a specific account, product or parcel. We identify the source and date when using it; historical fees are not silently applied to a current basket.
If a product or claim matters to your decision, retain the exact source and the question still to be answered. Start at the directory overview for the site map, or About for the broader editorial approach.
Sources & scope
- Product directory
Public product-field snapshot checked 22 – 23 Oct 2026; article counts are calculated from the visible directory.
- About the directory
How the catalogue, images and editorial checks are used.
- Community source summaries
Three original discussions reviewed 2026-10-22; not verified customer orders.
How these notes are prepared: AI-assisted writing based on the dated records and sources above. Product comparisons are catalogue analysis, not hands-on purchase tests.